How Cases Should Be Decide- Juries, Legislative Presciption, Or Judicially Defined Princpals?

How Cases Should Be DecidedFrom the discussions and cost observations , it is my considered view that decisions of cases d in judiciary should be best determined by the application of judicially defined principles and legislative enactments and should non merely depend on ad hoc decisions made by juries .The concept of board mental auditory modality is as old as humanity . It is basically a proceeding in which decisions and findings of facts of a given case nuclear number 18 determined by a factor panel . Juries , upon the other pot argon selected to re lead on the cross-sections of the community (Hale Star V , McCormick 2000 ,.20-21 . frankincense , juries argon often regarded as peers of the impeach because they belong to the same(p) community where the criminate also lives . Jury running are designed to coun tenance a government sequencency of interjecting community norms and value to the judicial proceedings by providing opportunities for the members of the community to validate and test the applicability of the communities written . However , in care a shot s propagation , taking into consideration the major changes in our society and including its travel complexities , I posit that the control board clay failed to catch up to the judicial needs of cases d before the salutes of justiceIt is my considered view that decisions arrived by juries are no longstanding that applicable in nowadays s generation because I believe that the justice system should be composed of people who have deep experience and eat up in the field of law . By using the jury system we are in fact placing the burden of gustation on the mind of an advanceage and untrained citizen . Often assess , persons selected as jurors have no legal expertise . In my visit to courts , I observed that t he jurors are average citizens and I doubt i! f they really have an in depth knowledge in law and jurisprudence .

gum olibanum , having no worthy legal knowledge they can get easily swayed and persuaded by clever lawyers who trained themselves to confuse and mislead the jurors by means of their colored languages and speeches . Another reason why I aver that decisions should no longer be placed to the men of a jury is that , jurors have the tendency to be swayed by wrong through application of racial considerations , gender orientations and biases . In the court trial I saw , I observed that the jurors are not at all diverse in backwash , wake or age . Thus , the fate of an accused or the person in court is left to the hands of a layman that is often guided by his let in-person biases and beliefs regarding his own creed , religion , sex , age and race . Lastly , I believe that the jury system is no longer viable in today s courts because of the realities that are present in the system , which is the picking of the jury is no longer as objective as it were before . Thus much often we end up with jurors , just like the juries I have seen in my visit to courts , to be world-weary , without arouse and...If you want to get a full essay, commit it on our website: BestEssayCheap.com

If you want to get a full essay, visit our page: cheap essay